Food sharing behavior in the hairy-legged vampire bat Diphylla ecaudata

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Elizalde-Arellano ◽  
Juan Carlos López-Vidal ◽  
Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales ◽  
Rodrigo A. Medellín ◽  
John W. Laundré
Nature ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 308 (5955) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald S. Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Crosby ◽  
Edward Legg ◽  
Katharina Friederike Brecht ◽  
Michael Mendl ◽  
Ljerka Ostojic ◽  
...  

Male Eurasian jays were previously reported to alter their food-sharing response in line with the specific satiety of their female partner. Here, we tested the flexibility of the same males’ food-sharing behavior by testing whether they can process information from contextual cues that predict the opposite pattern of food shared to that observed in previous studies. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the amount of food eaten by the females in a choice context before males shared with them. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the identity of the non-chosen food that was available in a choice context before males shared with the females. In both experiments, males showed flexibility in their sharing pattern in a comparison between the experimental and control conditions. In Experiment 1, this observed pattern appears to be based on the males’ response to the amount of food eaten by the female, and in Experiment 2, it appears to be based on the males’ response to the choice context in which the female’s eating took place. Although the experimental conditions in Experiments 1 and 2 were conceptual replications, the predicted pattern of food shared by the males was detected only in the latter. While replications are needed to test the generalizability and robustness of these results, the current study provides a first set of data in line with the hypothesis that the Eurasian jay males may be able to flexibly adjust their food-sharing behavior to contextual cues. Raw data are available at 10.5281/zenodo.3633986, and code and meta-data are available at https://osf.io/n9rcd/.


2002 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gurven ◽  
Kim Hill ◽  
Hillard Kaplan

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald G. Carter ◽  
Gerald S. Wilkinson

Behaviour ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (11) ◽  
pp. 1203-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen Crick ◽  
Malini Suchak ◽  
Timothy M. Eppley ◽  
Matthew W. Campbell ◽  
Frans B.M. de Waal

Both wild and captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) share food with non-relatives. Researchers have proposed several hypotheses to explain this behavior, including ‘food for sex’, ‘food for grooming or agonistic support’, and ‘sharing under pressure’. We examined food sharing in two captive groups of socially-housed chimpanzees. In contrast to previous captive studies, which only examined transfers of low-quality foods, we conducted seven trials with high-quality food and seven with low-quality food for each group to directly compare transfers of different food qualities. We recorded how male chimpanzees shared food, including active transfers, passive transfers, and co-feeding. We also noted all instances of copulations, female estrous states, benign attempts to access food (termed ‘perseverance’), and aggressive attempts (termed ‘harassment’) to examine whether any of these factors influenced food sharing. Male food possessors shared at the same rate in both food quality conditions, but seemingly for different reasons, indicating that food quality may affect the exchange of social benefits in chimpanzees. In the low-quality condition, there was an interaction with rank and perseverance: while low- and middle-ranking females received more food the more they persevered, high-ranking females received more food without perseverance and gained relatively little benefit from persevering. In the high-quality condition, there was an interaction between copulations and perseverance: females who copulated with the male food possessor received more food during that trial with less perseverance. Non-copulating females received more transfers the more they persevered. This result was only observed in the short-term — copulations over the previous year were not correlated with food transfers. Further, the copulations observed here were unusual for these chimpanzees in that they were not confined to peak fertility, suggesting a non-conceptive function for copulations in chimpanzees. Copulations in this study may have functioned to reduce tension and increase short-term tolerance, allowing females better access to food.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document